Which strategy is most effective for identifying a poorly executed overhand throw?

The most effective strategy for identifying a poorly executed overhand throw is to compare skill performance with skill cue criteria. Skill cues are specific aspects of a skill that, when observed, can help determine the quality of the performance. By using predetermined criteria that define what a proper overhand throw looks like—such as body positioning, arm motion, and follow-through—educators can objectively assess whether the student is executing the throw correctly. This method allows for a focused evaluation based on technical proficiency rather than subjective judgment or outcome.

In contrast, comparing a student's performance with other students might not yield useful insights into their individual technique and could potentially discourage learners who are still developing their skills. Evaluating where the object lands is primarily concerned with the outcome rather than the execution of the throw, which can overlook important technical flaws. Practicing without the object can help students focus on technique, but it does not allow for assessment of the throw itself in a realistic context. Therefore, utilizing skill cue criteria offers a structured approach for identifying specific areas of improvement in the overhand throw.